# Cinecraft 0.1.0 — release candidate

*An ontology of the film process — phases, roles, and the artifacts people hand each other — in
CH/DE/EN.* Definitions are English; preferred labels are the CH/DE word where one is attested.

**Namespace** `https://w3id.org/cinecraft/` · **Licence** CC BY 4.0 (tooling: Apache 2.0) · **Version** 0.1.0

> **This is a release candidate, built and not published — so every URI below currently 404s.**
> The `w3id` registration is a pull request to a third-party repository. It is **written and not
> submitted**, and it cannot be submitted until the bundle is served from somewhere for it to
> redirect to. What `…/CC-000123` will resolve to is settled and written down — `GOVERNANCE.md`
> §2a — rather than left to whoever submits it.
>
> The legal track that used to gate this is closed. **`1.0.0` waits on the practitioner validation
> D13c defers, and on nothing else.** `0.1.0` does not wait for it, and is honest about being a
> candidate.

## What is in it

| | |
|---|---:|
| entries | 2,600 |
| classes | 22 of 22 |
| labels | 10,911 |
| relation bullets | 14,915 |
| relation targets | 21,775 |
| targets resolving to an id | 21,771 (100.0 %) |

- `ACTIVITY` — 272
- `CAREER` — 15
- `CONDITION` — 61
- `DECISION` — 53
- `DEFECT` — 39
- `DEPARTMENT` — 38
- `DOCUMENT` — 202
- `EQUIPMENT` — 213
- `EVENT` — 77
- `MEDIA` — 349
- `MONEY` — 83
- `OBJECT` — 59
- `ORGANISATION` — 102
- `PARAMETER` — 98
- `PHASE` — 39
- `PLACE` — 32
- `RIGHT` — 24
- `ROLE` — 180
- `STATE` — 16
- `TECHNIQUE` — 443
- `WORKOBJECT` — 152
- `WORKUNIT` — 53

## The limitations, by number

These are **published, not hidden**, and three decisions of record are why.

| | | |
|---|---:|---|
| entries carrying a `gap` line | 1,210 | 46.5 % — the pack was thin somewhere and the entry says where |
| entries with `source none` | 98 | 3.8 % — no independent source names the term. The hedge sits **inside the definition**, not four slots below it |
| historical entries | 157 | each should name what replaced it |
| relation targets that resolve to nothing | 4 | 0.02 % |
| validator errors · warnings | 0 · 12 | every one enumerated by the validator, and none of them silent |

**D21** keeps a term whose only witness was the lexicon, because that says something about our source
pack and nothing about the term. **D22** holds a term whose *referent* could not be established at
all — held terms are counted on the triage row and appear in no entry, so this file's counts do not
include them. **D13c** defers practitioner validation, which is the largest limitation of all and the
one no measurement here can close.

**The corpus behind the attestation figures is 18 speakers across 2 of roughly 20 departments.**
Attestation is a retrieval weight and never a gate (D1) precisely because of that shape.

## Identifiers

Opaque, stable, never derived from a label — `CC-000001` … `CC-002600`, at
`https://w3id.org/cinecraft/CC-000123`. Labels in this domain are contested (`Oberbeleuchter` against `Chefbeleuchter`,
five live labels for the DoP) and an identifier built from one picks a side, permanently, in an
argument the ontology exists to record rather than settle.

Assignment is in **authoring order**, not alphabetical: alphabetical order is label order, and
ordering by label would let a relabelling renumber the corpus. Numbers are assigned once and never
reused; a retired node keeps its id and gains a tombstone.

## Files

| file | what |
|---|---|
| `cinecraft-0.1.0.json` | the bundle — ids minted, every reference carrying both its label and the id it resolves to |
| `cinecraft-0.1.0.ids.tsv` | the id map |
| `cinecraft-0.1.0.skos.ttl` | SKOS concept scheme — labels, definitions, `broader`, `related` |
| `cinecraft-0.1.0.owl.ttl` | the OWL 2 profile — 22 classes, object properties with **measured** ranges |
| `index.html` | the browsable artifact. One file, opens from `file://`, fetches nothing |
| `CITATION.cff` | so a citation resolves |

SKOS carries the **vocabulary** and OWL carries the **model**. They are separate on purpose:
`skos:related` would flatten `used_by`, `succeeded_by` and `precedes` into one predicate, and an
alignment built on that would be worse than no alignment.

## Attribution

The term inventory was seeded by triage of all 6,718 lemmata of the *Lexikon der Filmbegriffe*
(Universität Kiel). **No text from it is reproduced, and every published entry carries an independent
attestation.** The working set — the scrape, `glossary-triage.tsv`, article text — is not licensed,
not published, and never will be.

Any alignment to AdA Filmontology (CC BY-SA 3.0) must be **URI references only**. CC BY 4.0 is
available to this artifact precisely because it imports nothing from a share-alike source.
